Skip down to page content.

Contact Information

Photo of Les Bailey & Associates Real Estate
Les Bailey & Associates
Keller Williams Realty Alaska Group
11901 Business Blvd #105
Eagle River AK 99577
Direct: 907.694.1234
Fax: 907-696-6520

Les Bailey & Associates Real Estate Team Blog

Les Bailey & Associates

Blog

Displaying blog entries 11-20 of 29

Subprime Market Crumble; Contributed to Economic Crisis

5 Reasons the Subprime Market Crumbled

In 2000, as housing prices grew out of reach for buyers, more creative financing crept in and subprime lending became big business. Wall Street wanted its hands on more of these loans, and the hot housing market spawned a wave of new subprime companies. By 2004, 75 percent of borrowers were buying a home without using a down payment or proving income.

But by 2006 the subprime market started falling apart; Borrowers were defaulting on loans and subprime companies were going out of business. Bitner says these are some factors that caused the subprime market to crumble:

1. Greed. Mortgage brokers made more money if they sold loans with higher fees and interest rates. So borrowers would often be steered toward riskier products, even if a more traditional (and less risky) loan were available. "My income was directly proportional to the revenue I generated, and subprime was three to five times more profitable than any other type of loan we securitized," Bitner says. "I saw no logical reason to sell something that made less money and carried no competitive advantage."

2. Rampant fraud. Bitner estimates that more than 70 percent of all brokered loan applications submitted to his company were in some way deceptive, which meant everything had to be double-checked and verified. "The practice of massaging loans, making them appear different from what they are, became standard operating procedure," Bitner says. "With little accountability for their actions, brokers [were] left to decide how far they're willing to go."

Common cases of fraud included altering income documentation, giving a borrower an adjustable rate mortgage without explaining how it works, or disclosing lower rates and fees to a borrower but then increasing the figures right before closing.

3. No standards. Everyone wanted to cash in on the subprime business, even if they didn't know how the business worked. "With few rules and minimal consumer protections, abusive behavior flourished," Bitner writes. The number of mortgage broker companies increased by 50 percent between 2001 and 2006, peaking at 53,000 in 2006. Meanwhile, the number of new loan originators working for mortgage brokers grew by 100,000.

Yet no national standard existed for licensing mortgage brokers and loan originators. Bitner says the industry needs to raise its standards and develop a system for accreditation. "The recent debacle has given brokers a reputation similar to used car salesmen," Bitner writes. "Although the bankers and brokers associations don't have a history of working together on issues, a collaborative effort to accredit loan originators would be a key step to rebuilding credibility for the industry."

4. Securitization of mortgages. Mortgage securitization fragmented the industry, Bitner says. Previously, banks would provide the money to fund a mortgage, but with securitization, the funding got divided into several components.

Here's how it works: Brokers originate the loan, a mortgage lender funded it, and a lender then sold it to another financial institution or used an investment bank to package it into a mortgage-backed security. Investors then bought them for their portfolio. "The problem in today's housing market exists because the investment banks packaged high-risk loans into securities and the rating agencies assessed them as investment quality," Bitner writes. "If the investors who purchased the securities understood what they were buying, the outcome would likely have been different."

5. Ultra-relaxed underwriting standards. As the subprime market took off, a pricing war among subprime lenders emerged. In order for lenders to keep their revenues up, they needed to fund more borrowers, leading to less restrictive underwriting. "It's easy to lose sight of what constitutes a good credit risk when you spend all day looking at marginal deals," Bitner writes.

Indeed, riskier products emerged, such as loans that required no down payment, proof of income, or even a history of paying rent. One loan product even allowed borrowers with credit scores of 580 and a 90-day-late payment in their housing history to qualify for 100 percent financing.

Energy Audits (short video)

Learn About Energy Audits

The following is excerpted from Sustainable Housing and Building Green (Dearborn, 2008) by Marie S. Spodek and Ken Deshaies.


Audits in the Real Estate Transaction

Energy audits are an excellent source of additional information to help sellers, builders, and buyers make quantifiable decisions when buying new appliances or a new home. Tenants also benefit because energy audits allow them to choose energy-efficient rentals. (VIDEO: Watch an energy audit in action.)


Economic Stabilization: What Happens Now?

Economic Stabilization: What Happens Now?

The following is a reprint from the National Association of Realtor Magazine.  It helps understand the economic bailout in layman terms.

The immediate impact of the new economic stabilization bill, signed by President George Bush today, will be renewed confidence in the market, two real estate experts said in separate interviews with the editors of REALTOR® Magazine. But don’t expect credit markets to turn around tomorrow. The recovery process will take time, say Kenneth Riggs, head of the commercial real estate analysis firm Real Estate Research Corp. in Chicago and Gary Keller, head of national residential real estate franchisor Keller Williams in Austin, Texas. We asked Keller about the impact of the credit crisis and the stabilization bill on residential real estate, and we asked Riggs for the same analysis from a commercial real estate standpoint.

REALTOR® Magazine: Now that both the House and the Senate have passed the stabilization bill and President Bush is set to sign it, what can we expect the impact to be?

Gary Keller: The market should regain some confidence, and since markets are built mainly on confidence, that’s no small thing. In fact it’s a huge thing and it’s imperative for the market to move forward. But beyond that, we have to wait and see. Although the intent of the legislation is to free up capital for lending on homes, cars, college, and business inventories, the government doesn’t have a mechanism in the bill for making the banks turn around and lend the money back. So no one knows what will actually happen once a bank has its capital freed up.

Kenneth Riggs: Well, it should give calmness to the financial markets by showing that we will in fact work through this crisis. That said, I don’t see the fundamental, or the mechanics, of capital changing right away. That won’t happen until we see how this package will actually operate and how well Treasury can do in buying and then selling the securities. So, the immediate impact would be that the market should at least breathe a sigh of relief. The next step will be to give a foundation for the credit markets to start functioning a little better. We will never get back to the level that we were a year ago; that’s part of the market cleansing itself of a culture in which capital was just too available and too cheap. The bill, too, is raising the FDIC insurance limit for bank deposits to $250,000. Many people will say, “Well, the small person might not have that much.” But it’s really small businesses that are being addressed here, and they’re what run our country. This will allow small companies like a lot of real estate brokerages to start focusing on their business, rather than the credit crunch, and to concentrate on how they can become productive.

RM: What are conditions on the ground now? Is anybody getting a loan, and if so, who and at what terms and costs?

Keller: We’re not seeing any properly qualified buyer being turned down for a loan. But even more important, every foreclosed home automatically has financing on it, from the bank that owns it. From a buyer point of view, this is the market we’ve all been asking for. In most cities it is one of the greatest buyer’s markets we’ve seen in a long time. From a seller’s point of view, it varies. If someone bought a home in the last five to six years and put little to nothing down they might not be in a position to sell without bringing money to the table. But if they want to move up, this is the perfect time to do it. Any loss they take on the sale could very well be made up on their new purchase.

Riggs: Two months ago commercial real estate was actually doing reasonably well. Transactions were happening, though they were slowing down. But today people are pushing away from the table, both on the debt and the equity side. Very well seasoned institutions and investors that up until 30 days ago, before this free fall, were confident they could weather what was happening, now are just walking away. They’re not calling you back. People that committed to transactions are backing away. There used to be this reputational risk element to deals, but even the biggest players are saying, “No, I can’t stomach this” and just walking away.

RM: What other measures could the federal government take to help get real estate moving?

Riggs: There should be a close examination of this mark-to-market accounting. A lot of people say you can’t throw it out—this is the transparency we need—but the problem is, even if you read fair-market rules—and the SEC has sent out a clarification on them—it states that, if you’re in a market that doesn’t have [fair-value observations, then you can be exempted from basing valuation on what comparable assets are selling for]. Or let’s say that for residential the only observation you have are at fire-sale prices, what good is that accounting rule if you’re marking everything down to fire-sale prices? It doesn’t make sense. So I think that should be the next close examination and it wouldn’t surprise me if in fact that [exemption] isn’t extended for certain companies or financial institutions just for an interim period. I think that would be a wise choice because the fulfillment of fair-marketing accounting, while the spirit and appropriateness is exactly on target, [can’t work when you’re] in an environment like this one.

RM: What will be the most reliable sources of financing going forward? Local banks? At what terms and costs?

Keller: So far, it’s business as unusual. Lenders who have money are lending and banks that own houses are lending on those houses. The real estate market has actually shown signs of short-term progress. Beyond that, these are questions no one knows the answer to. In other words, we’ll know it when it happens.

Riggs: There’s still money out there for good product but its high equity, so you have to be prepared for the market only providing capital for those until we get through this period. The private market has to lower its expectations, require more equity, put up better underwriting, provide better disclosures, and price risk better. Even with this rescue, we’re going to go through a slow economic time, with high end unemployment, and it’ll probably last for six months. People will want to see the problem fixed tomorrow, but it won’t be. It could take a year and a half for us to get back to where the market is functioning so that people are comfortable that things have been priced right, the proper credits are available, you’re lending to the right individuals, and the right institutions. But it’ll take until 2010. I would anticipate the residential market will show some rounding out if we can get through this, probably toward the second quarter of 2009.


The Housing Market Economy; Loan Issues - Or Not ?

The Housing Market Economy; Loan Issues - Or Not ?

I thought I would take a moment to talk about what is - and what isn’t going on in the real estate market today.

I do recognize that in some areas of the country things are very bad.  In fact I was recently at a Star Power meeting in with other top Realtors and was gasping at the market being presented by an agent from Ft Myers Florida with in some cases over 9 years supply of homes.

But here in South Central Alaska, things are slow and steady.  In some areas prices are up as much as 3 - 4% such as Eagle River and Anchorage, while in others area, such as Palmer and Wasilla, prices are down 3-5%.  But this is good news, when you compare it to other parts of the country, where home owners have seen the market and value of their home decline as much as 30 to 40 %.  The issue is loans, and buyers obtaining financing,  and really I have not noticed too much change other than credit scores are more important than ever.  All of the "stupid loans” are gone, and while the pay option arms had a purpose - particularly for someone who might move in less than 5 years - they are not being sold to buyers without good credit and a good down payment.

All markets are local, and while what happens almost anywhere these days effect the economy all over the world to some degree, housing markets are basically driven by the supply and demand and local economic conditions.   When the demand is up and supply is down, prices are up.  Conversely when the supply is up, and the demand is down, prices fall downwards. Basically we have a fairly balanced market; it is neither a Buyers Market or a Sellers Market.  Market values in Alaska continue to appreciate at a reasonable rate of about 2 -3 % annually.  When compared to the double digit appreciation rates of a couple years ago, this may be a snails pace to some, but the current appreciation rates are healthy.  It is precisely because Alaska did not go through much of the craziness some real estate markets went through, with zero down interest only loans, and annual appreciation rates of 25 – 30%, that we are not experiencing much of the doom and gloom we hear and read about in the news media.

What has changed is the loans need to make sense, and if so they are still being given.   As Eagle River’s top selling Prudential real estate team, we are having a slower year than last year, but homes are still selling.  In the heyday over 7 million homes sold across  the USA and there will be close around 5 million USA homes sold this year.  That’s still five million homes; and people still have to buy and sell; at the end of the day we all need a place to live and that is what housing has always and will always provide.  This will never change.

So I wanted to let you know we are still here and not going anyplace.  I am investing more in my team now than ever before and as with all things, this too will change.  We will be ready to work with you on all your real estate needs whether now or in the future.

What if I owe more than my house is worth?

Often in todays economy, Realtors hear the refrain from Sellers:  "But I owe more than my house is worth.  Particularly when you include Realtor fees, and closing cost, I cannot afford to sell".  There is a whole host of reasons sellers find themselves in such a position:

  • They paid too much for their house, and bought it at the top of the market
  • They have not owned it long enough to build equity, or perhaps they had an Adjustable Rate or Interest only Mortgage.
  • Another reason may be they had a zero down mortgage, and financed all the closing cost into the loan, and as such have not built enough equity.
  • Some Seller took out a second loan to remodel or pay college tuition for a child
  • Others may unfortunately be going through an expensive divorce that is eating away at community assets

The list of reasons are endless.  Many such sellers consider drastic steps, such as turning the keys back over to the Bank, or perhaps filing for bankrupt.  Either of which will trash the credit of the seller for years to come.

A typical Sellers situation may look something like this:  The Seller purchased the property three years ago at the top of the market for $300,000, financing in their loan origination fee, and other closing cost.  Two years ago the eldest child went to college, and they refinanced, pulling out $30,000 equity to pay college tuition.  Now there has been a downturn in the market, and because they had an Adjustiable Rate Mortgage, their loan payment has increased by $500 a month.  They can no longer make ends meet, and have to sell.  Their current mortgage payoff is $330,000, however the Realtor tells them the market value of their home is only $300,000.  Additionally it will cost them about $25,000 to sell their property.  Anyway you slice it, these Sellers are upside down by about $55,000.  They are considering filing bankrupty, or simply turning the keys back into the bank.

Such sellers may qualify for a little know secret banks do not readily advertise, it is refered to in the Real Estate community as the "Short Sale Process".  Basically the bank does not want to become the owner of your house, they are not in the business of owning real estate holdings, they are in the money lending.  Therefore the bank may be willing to forgive the seller of the difference, and allow the property to be sold for current market value.  Often times in is more cost effective for the Bank to cut their losses and move on, rather than go through the foreclosure process.

The "Short Sell Process" requires a Realtor who is familiar with the process, and can help the Seller navigate through this complicate process.  Further the Seller and the Property both need to qualify.  If a seller has a 2nd or 3rd note on the property, it becomes much more difficult to get all the variouse lenders to agree to participate.

If you would like more information on the Short Sale Process, please feel free to contact us.

Housing Market Appreciation in Alaska

Many investors and buyers wonder if Real Estate is still a good investment.  Will I continue to get a good appreciation rate.  For about six years, beginning in about 2001, real estate in many areas of the country enjoyed double digit appreciation rates.  New terms entered our vocabulary, like "Fip this House".  People would purchase a house, fix it up a bit, and then sell it a month or two later for a tidy profit.  In places like Las Vegas, out of state buyers would purchase a new house under construction from a Builder.  Six months later, as the house was being completed, they would list it with a Realtor, and sell it for sometimes as much as 15 to 20% more than they paid for it.  If they purchased  a $500,000 house, they usually gave the builder a 10% deposit ($50,000), and in six months, the house was worth 20% more than the purchase price.  When they sold it, it sold for $600,000, profit of $100,000.  This was flipping on steroids, and too much of this activity has resulted in over building, and the decline of the market in such geographic locations.

Alaska investors do not have to worry about the market crashing here as in the above senerio.  One of the reasons was the "Flipping Phenomone" never really took root here.  Sure there were a few investors who purchased and fixed up houses and sold them, this has always been the case.  Yet buyers were not going into new subdivisions, entering into contracts with builders, and then selling the house just as it was being completed.    Market values here in the Anchorage and Mat-Su area are still appreciating at about 3% per year; a good healthy appreciation rate.  A recent national study ranked Alaska as one of the lowest places in the nation where a decline in the housing market was probable.  In fact there was only a 2% chance market values in Alaska would decline.  Said another way, there is a 98% chance market values will continue to appreciate.

Are the winter months a good time to sell a home?

In Alaska, there is a strange phenomenom that occurs every year.  There is a common misconception amongst Alaskans that the Spring and Summer months are the best time to sell a home.  

Each Spring wives give their husbands "honey-do" lists and tell their husbands "it's time to put the home on the market."  Each Spring the number of listings and/or inventory in the Multiple Listing Service doubles and even triples.  During the Spring and Summer months, buyers have a lot more homes to choose from than during the winter months.  With that said, there is generally the same amount of buyers in the winter months than in the summer months.

What does that mean to you as a seller? 

It's quite simple...less inventory in the winter months with the same amount of buyers in the market, means your home has a lot fewer properties to compete against and more of a chance it will be picked by a buyer.  With the same amount of buyers looking at fewer homes, it generally equates to a shorter marketing time for Sellers.

Therefore, the winter months generally yield good sales.  In fact, January is traditionally the second best month for home sales in Alaska.  The winter months are a good time to sell a home for the most amount of money, in the least amount of time, and with the least hassle.

FSBO's Generally Sell for Less than When Using a Real Estate Professional

 Eighteen percent of FSBO sellers indicated that preparing the home for sale was the most difficult task when selling without the assistance of an agent, followed closely by understanding and performing paperwork (16 percent) and selling within their desired time frame (15 percent).

As for profit — after all is said and done, FSBOs don’t always come out with fatter wallets. Again, the numbers tell the truth.

Homes sold with the help of a real estate professional in 2006 sold on average for 32 percent more than FSBO sales. The median FSBO selling price in 2006 was $187,200, compared with $247,000 for agent-assisted transactions.

For Sale By Owner's are decreasing

A close look at "For-Sale-By-Owner" (FSBO) data
from NAR's 2006 Profile of Home Buyers and Sellers

Each year a small army of home sellers throw caution to the wind and “go it alone” — without the assistance of a licensed real estate professional.

This ever-decreasing band of risk-takers, ventures into the land of pricing, marketing, screening, scheduling, showing and paperwork, with the goal of saving some money. It's often an experience they find less than rewarding.

The numbers (if not the sellers) tell the story.

In 2006, just 12 percent of sellers chose the FSBO (“For Sale By Owner”) route, down from 13 percent the previous year, according to NAR’s 2006 Profile of Home Buyers and Sellers. This is down from about 20 percent in 1987.

But more telling than the decline in FSBOs is the fact that 40 percent of all FSBOs sold their homes to someone they knew prior to the transaction. This means that only 7 percent of all home sales are open market FSBO transactions. The rest are simply unrepresented sellers in private transactions.

New Construction in Alaska

If you are considering building a new home in the Anchorage or Mat-Su Valley, it's a good time to start.  Les Bailey and Associates is well versed in the new construction process and will help you get into the home of your dreams within your budget. 

If you currently have a home you need to sell before you can build your new home, don't worry, Les Bailey and Associates has a "Guaranteed Purchase Program" to ensure you get into your new construction home.  If you are interested in this program, you can contact Les Bailey and Associates on the web at www.LesBaileyandAssociates.com or www.RealEstateInAk.com

From the time you decide to start a new construction home and enter into a Purchase and Sale Agreement, you can expect approximately 140 to 180 days for completion of your new home.  During this time, you won't make a single mortgage payment on your new home because the Builder assumes all interest in your lot and construction loan during the construction process.  That essentially buys you approximately 6 months to get your current home sold if you need to do so.  Keep in mind, it takes more than only placing a For Sale sign in your yard to get your home sold now.  It is crucial you list your home with a top producing realtor with an agressive marketing system.  Don't just list with any realtor because most realtors can't afford to agressively market your home.  Make sure you do your homework and list with a realtor with a proven marketing system. 

Displaying blog entries 11-20 of 29

Les Bailey & Associates
Keller Williams Realty Alaska Group
11901 Business Blvd #105
Eagle River AK 99577
© 2003 – 2010 Real Pro Systems, LLC
Last modified 7/31/2010